<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digg Traffic Peaked Last Summer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jivebay.com/2009/03/25/digg-traffic-peaked-last-summer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jivebay.com/2009/03/25/digg-traffic-peaked-last-summer/</link>
	<description>Web Development, Code Snippets, Technology, Reviews and Random Stuff Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 23:09:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: blogger</title>
		<link>http://jivebay.com/2009/03/25/digg-traffic-peaked-last-summer/comment-page-1/#comment-3218</link>
		<dc:creator>blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 22:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jivebay.com/?p=506#comment-3218</guid>
		<description>I noticed when you did your graph, you included the .com and I omitted it on mine, so the graph I did picks up the terms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed when you did your graph, you included the .com and I omitted it on mine, so the graph I did picks up the terms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RevAaron</title>
		<link>http://jivebay.com/2009/03/25/digg-traffic-peaked-last-summer/comment-page-1/#comment-3217</link>
		<dc:creator>RevAaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 17:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jivebay.com/?p=506#comment-3217</guid>
		<description>I wonder what the deal is with the Google trends graph? When I did the query today, there was no dramatic increase in Fark&#039;s search volume- a modest increase, but digg did better.

Huh.



&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/trends?q=digg.com%2C+fark.com%2C+reddit.com&amp;ctab=0&amp;geo=all&amp;date=all&amp;sort=0&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;see this trend graph&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder what the deal is with the Google trends graph? When I did the query today, there was no dramatic increase in Fark&#8217;s search volume- a modest increase, but digg did better.</p>
<p>Huh.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/trends?q=digg.com%2C+fark.com%2C+reddit.com&amp;ctab=0&amp;geo=all&amp;date=all&amp;sort=0" rel="nofollow">see this trend graph</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
